Greater public scrutiny of the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations
Those for this policy agree that
the Australian Government should publicly release more information about the contents of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal and its position in the negotiations
27 subscribers
Be careful!
Without a magic crystal ball, there's no way to predict with absolute certainty what representatives will do in future, no matter what they promise you now or how they voted in the past.
Nonetheless, exploring how they voted before can help you decide who to support in an election.
Voted consistently for greater public scrutiny of the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations
Something not right?
Voted generally for greater public scrutiny of the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations
Something not right?
Voted a mixture of for and against greater public scrutiny of the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations
Something not right?
Voted almost always against greater public scrutiny of the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations
Something not right?
Voted consistently against greater public scrutiny of the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations
-
![Photo of Matthew Canavan]()
Matthew Canavan
-
![Photo of Richard Colbeck]()
Richard Colbeck
-
![Photo of David Fawcett]()
David Fawcett
-
![Photo of James McGrath]()
James McGrath
-
![Photo of Bridget McKenzie]()
Bridget McKenzie
-
![Photo of Linda Reynolds]()
Linda Reynolds
-
![Photo of Anne Ruston]()
Anne Ruston
-
![Photo of Dean Smith]()
Dean Smith
We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on greater public scrutiny of the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations
-
![Photo of Catryna Bilyk]()
Catryna Bilyk
-
![Photo of Don Farrell]()
Don Farrell
-
![Photo of Katy Gallagher]()
Katy Gallagher
-
![Photo of Barnaby Joyce]()
Barnaby Joyce
-
![Photo of Jacqui Lambie]()
Jacqui Lambie
-
![Photo of Jenny McAllister]()
Jenny McAllister
-
![Photo of Nick McKim]()
Nick McKim
-
![Photo of Louise Pratt]()
Louise Pratt
-
![Photo of Matt Thistlethwaite]()
Matt Thistlethwaite
-
![Photo of Penny Wong]()
Penny Wong
Relevant divisions
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for greater public scrutiny of the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations”. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of a person on this policy.
| Division | Supporters vote | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for greater public scrutiny of the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations”.
| Division | Supporters vote |
|---|---|
13th Oct 2015, 4:02 PM – Senate Motions — Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement |
Yes |
26th Mar 2015, 1:26 PM – Senate Motions - Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement - Undertake a cost benefit analysis |
Yes |
11th Feb 2015, 3:50 PM – Senate Motions — Request for more transparency in Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal. |
Yes |
29th Oct 2014 – Senate Motions - Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement - Give members of Parliament access to the draft text |
Yes |
23rd Nov 2011 – Senate Motions — Trans-Pacific Partnership |
Yes |
If you know of other divisions that relate to this policy, you can add them in the Votes section of that division‘s page.