We can't say anything concrete about how Katy Gallagher voted on greater public scrutiny of the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations
How Katy Gallagher voted compared to someone who agrees that the Australian Government should publicly release more information about the contents of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal and its position in the negotiations
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for greater public scrutiny of the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations” which Katy Gallagher could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Katy Gallagher on this policy.
| Division | Katy Gallagher | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for greater public scrutiny of the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations” which Katy Gallagher could have attended.
| Division | Katy Gallagher | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th Oct 2015, 4:02 PM – Senate Motions — Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement |
absent | Yes |
26th Mar 2015, 1:26 PM – Senate Motions - Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement - Undertake a cost benefit analysis |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Katy Gallagher has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.