Michael Forshaw

How do they vote?

Please note that our voting records start in February 2006.

Rebel votes

Michael Forshaw has never voted against the majority of their party since February 2006. explain rebellions

Free votes

Michael Forshaw has taken part in 3 free votes since February 2006. explain “Free Votes”

1. edited 7th Oct 2014

   9th Feb 2006, 4:49 PM Senate

   Therapeutic Goods Amendment (Repeal of Ministerial Responsibility for Approval of Ru486) Bill 2005 - Third Reading - Read a third time

   Michael Forshaw voted No in this free vote

   Passed by a small majority

   No rebellions 96% attendance

2. edited 7th Oct 2014

   9th Feb 2006, 4:25 PM Senate

   Therapeutic Goods Amendment (Repeal of Ministerial Responsibility for Approval of Ru486) Bill 2005 - In Committee - Amend the current process

   Michael Forshaw voted Yes in this free vote

   Not passed by a small majority

   No rebellions 97% attendance

3. edited 7th Oct 2014

   9th Feb 2006, 4:07 PM Senate

   Therapeutic Goods Amendment (Repeal of Ministerial Responsibility for Approval of Ru486) Bill 2005 - In Committee - Amend the current process

   Michael Forshaw voted Yes in this free vote

   Not passed by a small majority

   No rebellions 95% attendance

Recent Votes

Recent votes in parliament that this Senator could have attended.

1. 23rd Jun 2011 Senate

   Bills — In Committee

   Michael Forshaw was absent

   Not passed by a large majority

   No rebellions 58% attendance

2. 23rd Jun 2011 Senate

   Business — Matters of Public Importance; Consideration of Legislation

   Michael Forshaw voted No

   Not passed

   No rebellions 82% attendance

3. 23rd Jun 2011 Senate

   Committees — Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee; Reference

   Michael Forshaw voted No

   Not passed

   No rebellions 84% attendance

Compare Michael Forshaw with someone else

Shows people in order of those who voted always the same as Michael Forshaw (100% agreement) to those who never voted the same (0% agreement).

We only compare those votes where both people attended. This may reveal relationships between people that were previously unsuspected. Or it may be nonsense.