We can't say anything concrete about how Michael Forshaw voted on requiring a warrant to access citizens’ telecommunications records
How Michael Forshaw voted compared to someone who agrees that staff of government agencies should need a warrant before being able to access the telecommunications records of citizens
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for requiring a warrant to access citizens’ telecommunications records” which Michael Forshaw could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Michael Forshaw on this policy.
| Division | Michael Forshaw | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
20th Sep 2007, 7:53 PM – Senate Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Bill 2007 — In Committee — Require judicial warrants |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for requiring a warrant to access citizens’ telecommunications records” which Michael Forshaw could have attended.
| Division | Michael Forshaw | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Michael Forshaw was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.