Compare how Tanya Plibersek and Paul Neville voted on increasing political transparency
Tanya Plibersek
Australian Labor Party Representative for Sydney since October 1998
Paul Neville
Former National Party Representative for Hinkler March 1993 – August 2013
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should increase transparency requirements for political parties (for example, requiring full and prompt disclosure of any political donations on easy-to-search public websites)
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing political transparency” which either Tanya Plibersek or Paul Neville could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Tanya Plibersek and Paul Neville on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Tanya Plibersek | Paul Neville | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
17th Nov 2010, 11:44 AM – Representatives Commonwealth Electoral Amendment (Political Donations and Other Measures) Bill 2010 - Second Reading - Agree to the bill's main idea |
absent | No | Yes |
16th Mar 2009, 6:27 PM – Representatives Commonwealth Electoral Amendment (Political Donations and Other Measures) Bill 2009 - Second Reading - Agree to the bill's main idea |
Yes | No | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing political transparency” which either Tanya Plibersek or Paul Neville could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Tanya Plibersek | Paul Neville | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
4th Aug 2022, 11:59 AM – Representatives Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Transparency |
Yes | - | Yes |
20th Oct 2021, 5:08 PM – Representatives Committees — Privileges and Members' Interests Committee; Reference |
No | - | No |