A review of parliamentary entitlements
Those for this policy agree that
the federal government should set up a review of parliamentary entitlements and allowances, including legitimate expenditure, salary packages, superannuation entitlements and other allowances
29 subscribers
Be careful!
Without a magic crystal ball, there's no way to predict with absolute certainty what representatives will do in future, no matter what they promise you now or how they voted in the past.
Nonetheless, exploring how they voted before can help you decide who to support in an election.
Voted consistently against a review of parliamentary entitlements
Something not right?We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on a review of parliamentary entitlements
-
Catryna Bilyk
-
Simon Birmingham
-
Carol Brown
-
Michaelia Cash
-
Don Farrell
-
Sarah Hanson-Young
-
Barnaby Joyce
-
Helen Polley
-
Louise Pratt
-
Penny Wong
Relevant divisions
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a review of parliamentary entitlements”. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of a person on this policy.
Division | Supporters vote | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a review of parliamentary entitlements”.
Division | Supporters vote |
---|---|
16th Jun 2009, 4:17 PM – Senate Motions - Parliamentarians' Entitlements - Independent Parliamentary Standards Commissioner |
Yes |
6th Sep 2006, 4:01 PM – Senate Motions - Parliamentarians’ Entitlements - Review of remuneration and entitlements |
Yes |
If you know of other divisions that relate to this policy, you can add them in the Votes section of that division‘s page.