Independent reviews of significant legal changes
Those for this policy agree that
when a bill makes a significant change to existing law, the federal government should make sure the bill includes a provision that requires an independent review to take place after a defined period to ensure that the new regime is operating as intended
1 subscriber
Warning!
Don't share this. It's a
draft
which means someone is still working on it and
it may be
wildly innaccurate
Voted consistently for independent reviews of significant legal changes
Something not right?Voted a mixture of for and against independent reviews of significant legal changes
- Catryna Bilyk
- Carol Brown
- Katy Gallagher
- Jacqui Lambie
- Sue Lines
- Jenny McAllister
- Malarndirri McCarthy
- Louise Pratt
- Malcolm Roberts
- Tony Sheldon
- Glenn Sterle
- Anne Urquhart
- Jess Walsh
Voted consistently against independent reviews of significant legal changes
- Alex Antic
- Wendy Askew
- Andrew Bragg
- Slade Brockman
- Matthew Canavan
- Claire Chandler
- Perin Davey
- Jonathon Duniam
- Nita Green
- Sarah Henderson
- Hollie Hughes
- Jane Hume
- Susan McDonald
- James McGrath
- Bridget McKenzie
- Andrew McLachlan
- Matt O'Sullivan
- Gerard Rennick
- Linda Reynolds
- Anne Ruston
- Paul Scarr
- Dean Smith
- David Van
We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on independent reviews of significant legal changes
- Tim Ayres
- Simon Birmingham
- Michaelia Cash
- Anthony Chisholm
- Raff Ciccone
- Richard Colbeck
- Don Farrell
- David Fawcett
- Pauline Hanson
- Deborah O'Neill
- James Paterson
- Helen Polley
- Marielle Smith
- Murray Watt
- Penny Wong
Relevant divisions
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for independent reviews of significant legal changes”. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of a person on this policy.
Division | Supporters vote | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for independent reviews of significant legal changes”.
Division | Supporters vote |
---|---|
15th Jun 2020, 12:44 PM – Senate Migration Amendment (Regulation of Migration Agents) Bill 2019 and another - in Committee - Independent review |
Yes |
26th Feb 2020, 6:52 PM – Senate Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment (Simplifying Income Reporting and Other Measures) Bill 2020 - in Committee - Review |
Yes |
5th Dec 2019, 4:34 PM – Senate Australian Crime Commission Amendment (Special Operations and Special Investigations) Bill 2019 - Third Reading - Statutory review |
Yes |
If you know of other divisions that relate to this policy, you can add them in the Votes section of that division‘s page.