Reducing taxes for high-income earners
Those for this policy agree that
the federal government should reduce the amount of income tax that high-income earners (those who earn over $200,000 per year) must pay each year
8 subscribers
Be careful!
Without a magic crystal ball, there's no way to predict with absolute certainty what representatives will do in future, no matter what they promise you now or how they voted in the past.
Nonetheless, exploring how they voted before can help you decide who to support in an election.
Voted consistently for reducing taxes for high-income earners
-
Alex Antic
-
Wendy Askew
-
Tim Ayres
-
Simon Birmingham
-
Andrew Bragg
-
Slade Brockman
-
Ross Cadell
-
Claire Chandler
-
Raff Ciccone
-
Richard Colbeck
-
Perin Davey
-
Jonathon Duniam
-
David Fawcett
-
Katy Gallagher
-
Nita Green
-
Karen Grogan
-
Sarah Henderson
-
Hollie Hughes
-
Jacqui Lambie
-
Susan McDonald
-
James McGrath
-
Bridget McKenzie
-
Andrew McLachlan
-
Matt O'Sullivan
-
James Paterson
-
Fatima Payman
-
Gerard Rennick
-
Anne Ruston
-
Paul Scarr
-
Tony Sheldon
-
Marielle Smith
-
David Van
-
Jess Walsh
Voted almost always for reducing taxes for high-income earners
Something not right?Voted generally for reducing taxes for high-income earners
Something not right?Voted a mixture of for and against reducing taxes for high-income earners
-
Catryna Bilyk
-
Carol Brown
-
Anthony Chisholm
-
Don Farrell
-
Sue Lines
-
Jenny McAllister
-
Malarndirri McCarthy
-
Deborah O'Neill
-
Helen Polley
-
Louise Pratt
-
Glenn Sterle
-
Anne Urquhart
-
Murray Watt
-
Penny Wong
Voted consistently against reducing taxes for high-income earners
-
Penny Allman-Payne
-
Dorinda Cox
-
Mehreen Faruqi
-
Sarah Hanson-Young
-
Nick McKim
-
Barbara Pocock
-
David Pocock
-
David Shoebridge
-
David Smith
-
Jordon Steele-John
-
Lidia Thorpe
-
Larissa Waters
-
Peter Whish-Wilson
We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on reducing taxes for high-income earners
Something not right?Relevant divisions
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reducing taxes for high-income earners”. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of a person on this policy.
Division | Supporters vote |
---|---|
4th Jul 2019, 5:39 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Relief So Working Australians Keep More of Their Money) Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
Yes |
4th Jul 2019 – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Relief So Working Australians Keep More of Their Money) Bill 2019 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
Yes |
21st Jun 2018, 11:55 AM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Personal Income Tax Plan) Bill 2018 - Adoption of Report - Don't insist on amendments |
Yes |
21st Jun 2018, 11:41 AM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Personal Income Tax Plan) Bill 2018 - Consideration of House of Representatives Message - Don't insist on amendments |
Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reducing taxes for high-income earners”.
Division | Supporters vote |
---|---|
7th Feb 2023, 12:59 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (2022 Measures No. 5) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Abandon Stage 3 tax cuts |
No |
26th Oct 2022, 10:46 AM – Senate Supply Bill (No. 3) 2022-2023, Supply Bill (No. 4) 2022-2023 and another - Second Reading - Repeal stage 3 tax cuts |
No |
7th Sep 2022, 5:34 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Taxation - Stage 3 tax cuts |
No |
If you know of other divisions that relate to this policy, you can add them in the Votes section of that division‘s page.