Compare how Mitch Fifield and Nick McKim voted on changing the wording of section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for changing the wording of section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act” which either Mitch Fifield or Nick McKim could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mitch Fifield and Nick McKim on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Mitch Fifield	Nick McKim	Supporters vote
30th Mar 2017, 8:45 PM – Senate Human Rights Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea	Yes	No	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for changing the wording of section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act” which either Mitch Fifield or Nick McKim could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Mitch Fifield	Nick McKim	Supporters vote
21st Mar 2018, 4:20 PM – Senate Motions - International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination - Condemn Turnbull Government	No	Yes	No
30th Mar 2017, 10:04 PM – Senate Human Rights Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 - in Committee - Change 18C wording	Yes	No	Yes