How Andrew Bragg voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government needs to support research and conservation initiatives that aim to put a stop to the current trajectory of animal and plant extinctions in Australia

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for federal government action on animal & plant extinctions” which Andrew Bragg could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Andrew Bragg on this policy.

Division Andrew Bragg Supporters vote

28th Mar 2023, 8:04 PM – Senate National Reconstruction Fund Corporation Bill 2023 - in Committee - Consider biodiversity

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for federal government action on animal & plant extinctions” which Andrew Bragg could have attended.

Division Andrew Bragg Supporters vote

25th Mar 2024, 4:48 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Endangered Species - Increase funding for threatened species

absent Yes

7th Feb 2023, 6:26 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Global Biodiversity Framework - End native forest logging

absent Yes

2nd Feb 2021, 4:17 PM – Senate Motions - White Rock Quarry - Halt expansion

absent Yes

30th Nov 2020, 4:40 PM – Senate Motions - Environment - Protect Koala Habitat

No Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Andrew Bragg has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.