Compare how Robert McClelland and Russell Matheson voted on carbon farming

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for carbon farming” which either Robert McClelland or Russell Matheson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Robert McClelland and Russell Matheson on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Robert McClelland	Russell Matheson	Supporters vote
16th Jun 2011 – Representatives Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011 - Second Reading - Read a second time	Yes	No	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for carbon farming” which either Robert McClelland or Russell Matheson could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Robert McClelland	Russell Matheson	Supporters vote
16th Jun 2011 – Representatives Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011 - Second Reading - Keep original motion unchanged	Yes	No	Yes