Recent history: For adding Pensioners onto the Indue Card
-
Description changed from “NOTE: There are currently no divisions supporting this policy. The Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020 specifically did not include age pensioners. While some have pointed to provision 61 of this bill, it appears that that provision is an amendment to the definition of "restrictive payments" and does not seem to affect the definition of who is actually a program participant - that is, if a person is already a program participant due to sections 124PGD and 124PGE of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999, and they or their partner is also on the age pension, that age pension now seems to be included as a restrictive payment under this bill. If a person is only an age pension recipient, and doesn't receive any of the payments mentioned in sections 124PGD and 124PGE of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999, this provision does not seem to affect them. If you believe our reading of this bill's provisions is wrong, please let us know.” to “NOTE: There are currently no divisions supporting this policy. The Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020 specifically did not include age pensioners. While some have pointed to provision 61 of this bill, it appears that that provision is an amendment to the definition of "restrictive payments" and does not seem to affect the definition of who is actually a program participant - that is, if a person is already a program participant due to sections 124PGD and 124PGE of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999, and they or their partner is also on the age pension, that age pension now seems to be included as a restrictive payment under this bill. If a person is only an age pension recipient, and doesn't receive any of the payments referred to in sections 124PGD and 124PGE of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999, this provision does not seem to affect them. If you believe our reading of this bill's provisions is wrong, please let us know.”.
mackay staff about 3 years ago
-
Description changed from “NOTE: There are currently no divisions supporting this policy. The Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020 specifically did not include age pensioners. While some have pointed to provision 61 of this bill, it appears that that provision is an amendment to the definition of "restrictive payments" and does not seem to affect who is actually a program participant - that is, if a person is already a program participant due to sections 124PGD and 124PGE of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999, and they or their partner is also on the age pension, that age pension now seems to be included as a restrictive payment under this bill. If a person is only an age pension recipient, and doesn't receive any of the payments mentioned in sections 124PGD and 124PGE of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999, this provision does not seem to affect them. If you believe our reading of this bill's provisions is wrong, please let us know.” to “NOTE: There are currently no divisions supporting this policy. The Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020 specifically did not include age pensioners. While some have pointed to provision 61 of this bill, it appears that that provision is an amendment to the definition of "restrictive payments" and does not seem to affect the definition of who is actually a program participant - that is, if a person is already a program participant due to sections 124PGD and 124PGE of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999, and they or their partner is also on the age pension, that age pension now seems to be included as a restrictive payment under this bill. If a person is only an age pension recipient, and doesn't receive any of the payments mentioned in sections 124PGD and 124PGE of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999, this provision does not seem to affect them. If you believe our reading of this bill's provisions is wrong, please let us know.”.
mackay staff about 3 years ago
-
Description changed from “NOTE: There are currently no divisions supporting this policy. The Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020 specifically did not include age pensioners (that is, it extended the cashless debit card to those aged at least 25 but under pension age). While some have pointed to provision 61 of this bill, it appears that that provision is an amendment to the definition of "restrictive payments" and does not seem to affect who is actually a program participant - that is, if a person is already a program participant due to sections 124PGD and 124PGE of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999, and they or their partner is also on the age pension, that age pension now seems to be included as a restrictive payment under this bill. If a person is only an age pension recipient, and doesn't receive any of the payments mentioned in sections 124PGD and 124PGE of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999, this provision does not seem to affect them. If you believe our reading of this bill's provisions is wrong, please let us know.” to “NOTE: There are currently no divisions supporting this policy. The Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020 specifically did not include age pensioners. While some have pointed to provision 61 of this bill, it appears that that provision is an amendment to the definition of "restrictive payments" and does not seem to affect who is actually a program participant - that is, if a person is already a program participant due to sections 124PGD and 124PGE of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999, and they or their partner is also on the age pension, that age pension now seems to be included as a restrictive payment under this bill. If a person is only an age pension recipient, and doesn't receive any of the payments mentioned in sections 124PGD and 124PGE of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999, this provision does not seem to affect them. If you believe our reading of this bill's provisions is wrong, please let us know.”.
mackay staff about 3 years ago
-
Description changed from “NOTE: There are currently no divisions supporting this policy. The Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020 specifically did not include age pensioners (that is, it extended the cashless debit card to those aged at least 25 but under pension age). While some have pointed to provision 61 of this bill, it appears that that provision is an amendment to the definition of "restrictive payments" and does not affect who is actually a program participant - that is, if you are already a program participant due to sections 124PGD and 124PGE of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999, and you or your partner is also on the age pension, that pension will now be included as a restrictive payment. If you are in Cape York and only on the age pension, this provision does not make you a program participant. If you believe our reading of this bill's provisions is wrong, please let us know.” to “NOTE: There are currently no divisions supporting this policy. The Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020 specifically did not include age pensioners (that is, it extended the cashless debit card to those aged at least 25 but under pension age). While some have pointed to provision 61 of this bill, it appears that that provision is an amendment to the definition of "restrictive payments" and does not seem to affect who is actually a program participant - that is, if a person is already a program participant due to sections 124PGD and 124PGE of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999, and they or their partner is also on the age pension, that age pension now seems to be included as a restrictive payment under this bill. If a person is only an age pension recipient, and doesn't receive any of the payments mentioned in sections 124PGD and 124PGE of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999, this provision does not seem to affect them. If you believe our reading of this bill's provisions is wrong, please let us know.”.
mackay staff about 3 years ago
-
Description changed from “NOTE: There are currently no divisions supporting this policy. The Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020 specifically did not include pensioners (that is, it extended the cashless debit card to those aged at least 25 but under pension age).” to “NOTE: There are currently no divisions supporting this policy. The Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020 specifically did not include age pensioners (that is, it extended the cashless debit card to those aged at least 25 but under pension age). While some have pointed to provision 61 of this bill, it appears that that provision is an amendment to the definition of "restrictive payments" and does not affect who is actually a program participant - that is, if you are already a program participant due to sections 124PGD and 124PGE of the Social Security (Administration) Act 1999, and you or your partner is also on the age pension, that pension will now be included as a restrictive payment. If you are in Cape York and only on the age pension, this provision does not make you a program participant. If you believe our reading of this bill's provisions is wrong, please let us know.”.
mackay staff about 3 years ago
-
Description changed from “NOTE: There are currently no divisions supporting this policy. The Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020 specifically did not include people on old age pensions (that is, it extended the cashless debit card to those aged at least 25 but under pension age.” to “NOTE: There are currently no divisions supporting this policy. The Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020 specifically did not include pensioners (that is, it extended the cashless debit card to those aged at least 25 but under pension age).”.
mackay staff about 3 years ago
-
Description changed from “Pensioners should have 80% of their payments placed on a card that restricts them withdrawing cash, buying alcohol or using the many services that do not accept the Indue card.” to “NOTE: There are currently no divisions supporting this policy. The Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020 specifically did not include people on old age pensions (that is, it extended the cashless debit card to those aged at least 25 but under pension age.”.
mackay staff about 3 years ago
-
Removed division Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea. Policy vote was Yes (strong).
mackay staff about 3 years ago
-
Removed division Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020 - Third Reading - Pass the bill. Policy vote was Yes (strong).
mackay staff about 3 years ago
-
Removed division Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020 - Third Reading - Pass the bill. Policy vote was Yes (strong).
mackay staff about 3 years ago
-
Removed division Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Withdraw the bill. Policy vote was No (strong).
mackay staff about 3 years ago
-
Removed division Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Against program. Policy vote was No (strong).
mackay staff about 3 years ago
-
Removed division Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea. Policy vote was Yes (strong).
mackay staff about 3 years ago
-
Removed division Business - Consideration of Legislation - Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020. Policy vote was Yes.
Nugby about 3 years ago
-
Added division Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Withdraw the bill. Policy vote set to No (strong).
Nugby about 3 years ago
-
Added division Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Against program. Policy vote set to No (strong).
Nugby about 3 years ago
-
Added division Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea. Policy vote set to Yes (strong).
Nugby about 3 years ago
-
Added division Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea. Policy vote set to Yes (strong).
Nugby about 3 years ago
-
Added division Business - Consideration of Legislation - Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020. Policy vote set to Yes.
Nugby about 3 years ago
-
Added division Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020 - Third Reading - Pass the bill. Policy vote set to Yes (strong).
Nugby about 3 years ago
-
Added division Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020 - Third Reading - Pass the bill. Policy vote set to Yes (strong).
Nugby about 3 years ago
-
Created policy “adding Pensioners onto the Indue Card” with description “Pensioners should have 80% of their payments placed on a card that restricts them withdrawing cash, buying alcohol or using the many services that do not accept the Indue card.”.
Nugby about 3 years ago