We can't say anything concrete about how Sue Lines voted on increasing funding for public good research
How Sue Lines voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should invest more in research for the public good in the tertiary sector, including by supporting the PhD candidates undertaking it
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for public good research” which Sue Lines could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sue Lines on this policy.
| Division | Sue Lines | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for public good research” which Sue Lines could have attended.
| Division | Sue Lines | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
6th Mar 2023, 6:22 PM – Senate Higher Education Support Amendment (Australia's Economic Accelerator) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Support pure research |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Sue Lines was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.