We can't say anything concrete about how Sue Lines voted on strengthening gun control laws
How Sue Lines voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should maintain and strengthen gun control laws and make sure they're the same around Australia
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for strengthening gun control laws” which Sue Lines could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sue Lines on this policy.
| Division | Sue Lines | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
21st Nov 2016, 8:34 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Customs (Prohibited Imports) Amendment (Shotguns and Shotgun Magazines) Regulation 2016 - Disallowance |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for strengthening gun control laws” which Sue Lines could have attended.
| Division | Sue Lines | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
28th Nov 2018, 4:37 PM – Senate Motions - National Firearms Agreement - Resist moves to weaken |
Yes | Yes |
15th Sep 2016, 12:40 PM – Senate Motions - Gun Control - Strengthen laws |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Sue Lines has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.