How Slade Brockman voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase legal protections for women in the workplace, particularly in respect to sex discrimination and harassment

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing workplace protections for women” which Slade Brockman could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Slade Brockman on this policy.

Division Slade Brockman Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing workplace protections for women” which Slade Brockman could have attended.

Division Slade Brockman Supporters vote

1st Sep 2021, 6:28 PM – Senate Sex Discrimination and Fair Work (Respect at Work) Amendment Bill 2021 - in Committee - Overly high threshold

No Yes

1st Sep 2021, 6:05 PM – Senate Sex Discrimination and Fair Work (Respect at Work) Amendment Bill 2021 - in Committee - Unions, complaints mechanism and sex-based harassment

absent Yes

1st Sep 2021, 12:13 PM – Senate Sex Discrimination and Fair Work (Respect at Work) Amendment Bill 2021 - in Committee - Prohibition against sexual harassment

absent Yes

1st Sep 2021, 12:01 PM – Senate Sex Discrimination and Fair Work (Respect at Work) Amendment Bill 2021 - in Committee - Substantive gender equality

absent Yes

1st Sep 2021, 11:45 AM – Senate Sex Discrimination and Fair Work (Respect at Work) Amendment Bill 2021 - in Committee - Cost protection

absent Yes

1st Sep 2021, 11:29 AM – Senate Sex Discrimination and Fair Work (Respect at Work) Amendment Bill 2021 - in Committee - Positive duty amendment

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Slade Brockman has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.