We can't say anything concrete about how Slade Brockman voted on an independent Australian Federal Police
How Slade Brockman voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should ensure that the Australian Federal Police (AFP) have enough independence so that they can carry out their duties in relation to politically sensitive matters
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for an independent Australian Federal Police” which Slade Brockman could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Slade Brockman on this policy.
| Division | Slade Brockman | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for an independent Australian Federal Police” which Slade Brockman could have attended.
| Division | Slade Brockman | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
23rd Jul 2019, 3:46 PM – Senate Committees - Environment and Communications References Committee - Reference |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Slade Brockman has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.