We can't say anything concrete about how Ruth Webber voted on protecting the Great Barrier Reef
How Ruth Webber voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should make laws and regulations that protect and conserve the health of the Great Barrier Reef for future generations
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for protecting the Great Barrier Reef” which Ruth Webber could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Ruth Webber on this policy.
| Division | Ruth Webber | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for protecting the Great Barrier Reef” which Ruth Webber could have attended.
| Division | Ruth Webber | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Jun 2008, 3:48 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Act on conference conclusions |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Ruth Webber was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.