We can't say anything concrete about how Ross Lightfoot voted on increasing freedom of political communication
How Ross Lightfoot voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase freedom of political communication in Australia by, for example, protecting people's right to inform others about issues and events in the public interest
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing freedom of political communication” which Ross Lightfoot could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Ross Lightfoot on this policy.
Division | Ross Lightfoot | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
13th Sep 2007, 12:39 PM – Senate Commonwealth Electoral Amendment (Democratic Plebiscites) Bill 2007 - Second Reading - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing freedom of political communication” which Ross Lightfoot could have attended.
Division | Ross Lightfoot | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Ross Lightfoot was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.