Compare how Rachel Siewert and Amanda Vanstone voted on federal government action on animal & plant extinctions
Rachel Siewert
Former Australian Greens Senator for WA July 2005 – September 2021
Amanda Vanstone
Former Liberal Party Senator for SA December 1984 – April 2007
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government needs to support research and conservation initiatives that aim to put a stop to the current trajectory of animal and plant extinctions in Australia
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for federal government action on animal & plant extinctions” which either Rachel Siewert or Amanda Vanstone could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Rachel Siewert and Amanda Vanstone on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Rachel Siewert | Amanda Vanstone | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for federal government action on animal & plant extinctions” which either Rachel Siewert or Amanda Vanstone could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".