We can't say anything concrete about how Michaelia Cash voted on increasing the Renewable Energy Target (RET)
How Michaelia Cash voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase the Renewable Energy Target (RET) to further increase the proportion of electricity generated in Australia from renewable sources, reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases from electricity generation and promote the development of a renewable energy industry in Australia
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing the Renewable Energy Target (RET) ” which Michaelia Cash could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Michaelia Cash on this policy.
| Division | Michaelia Cash | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
23rd Jun 2015, 11:03 PM – Senate Renewable Energy (Electricity) Amendment Bill 2015 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | No |
17th Jun 2015, 6:02 PM – Senate Renewable Energy (Electricity) Amendment Bill 2015 - Second Reading - Agree to the bill's main idea |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing the Renewable Energy Target (RET) ” which Michaelia Cash could have attended.
| Division | Michaelia Cash | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Michaelia Cash was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.