We can't say anything concrete about how Matt O'Sullivan voted on increasing funding for legal aid
How Matt O'Sullivan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should maintain or increase funding for the legal assistance sector (Legal Aid, community legal centres, etc.)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for legal aid” which Matt O'Sullivan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Matt O'Sullivan on this policy.
| Division | Matt O'Sullivan | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for legal aid” which Matt O'Sullivan could have attended.
| Division | Matt O'Sullivan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
25th Jun 2024, 6:08 PM – Senate Appropriation Bill (No. 5) 2023-2024 and four others - Second Reading - Increase funding for legal assistance services |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Matt O'Sullivan was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.