We can't say anything concrete about how Mathias Cormann voted on a Royal Commission into banking
How Mathias Cormann voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should establish a Royal Commission into misconduct within the banking and financial services sector.
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a Royal Commission into banking” which Mathias Cormann could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mathias Cormann on this policy.
| Division | Mathias Cormann | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a Royal Commission into banking” which Mathias Cormann could have attended.
| Division | Mathias Cormann | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
28th Jun 2018, 12:25 PM – Senate Motions - Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry - Funding and farmers |
absent | Yes |
19th Apr 2016, 7:47 PM – Senate Motions - Financial Services - Royal Commission into banking sector |
absent | Yes |
19th Apr 2016, 6:41 PM – Senate Motions - Financial Services - Establish a Royal Commission |
absent | Yes |
24th Jun 2015 – Senate Committees — Financial Services |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Mathias Cormann was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.