We can't say anything concrete about how Mathias Cormann voted on limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees
How Mathias Cormann voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should commit to a target of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees celsius above pre-industrial levels
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees ” which Mathias Cormann could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mathias Cormann on this policy.
| Division | Mathias Cormann | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees ” which Mathias Cormann could have attended.
| Division | Mathias Cormann | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
27th Feb 2020, 12:31 PM – Senate Motions - Great Barrier Reef - Climate change |
absent | Yes |
3rd Dec 2019, 4:00 PM – Senate Motions - Great Barrier Reef - Climate change |
absent | Yes |
24th Jul 2019, 3:47 PM – Senate Motions - Great Barrier Reef - Protect from climate change |
absent | Yes |
26th Nov 2015, 12:26 PM – Senate Motions - Paris Climate Summit - Greens' motion |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Mathias Cormann was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.