We can't say anything concrete about how Louise Pratt voted on technology neutral emission reduction targets
How Louise Pratt voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government's policies to reduce Australia's greenhouse gas emissions should be "technology neutral", which means all forms of electricity generation should be on the table, including coal with carbon capture and storage and gas
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for technology neutral emission reduction targets” which Louise Pratt could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Louise Pratt on this policy.
| Division | Louise Pratt | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for technology neutral emission reduction targets” which Louise Pratt could have attended.
| Division | Louise Pratt | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
1st Dec 2016, 4:30 PM – Senate Motions - Coal Industry - For technology neutral policies |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Louise Pratt was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.