We can't say anything concrete about how Louise Pratt voted on the right to protest
How Louise Pratt voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should protect the right of its citizens to protest against its laws, policies and decisions
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the right to protest” which Louise Pratt could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Louise Pratt on this policy.
| Division | Louise Pratt | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
28th Jun 2018, 6:25 PM – Senate National Security Legislation Amendment (Espionage and Foreign Interference) Bill 2018 - in Committee - Freedom of speech |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the right to protest” which Louise Pratt could have attended.
| Division | Louise Pratt | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
25th Nov 2021, 4:04 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Australian Charities and Not-For-Profits Commission Amendment (2021 Measures No. 2) Regulations 2021 - Disallow |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Louise Pratt was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.