Compare how Louise Pratt and Chris Ketter voted on the Coalition's Youth Jobs PaTH

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the Coalition's Youth Jobs PaTH” which either Louise Pratt or Chris Ketter could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Louise Pratt and Chris Ketter on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Louise Pratt Chris Ketter Supporters vote

10th May 2017, 11:54 AM – Senate Social Security Legislation Amendment (Youth Jobs Path: Prepare, Trial, Hire) Bill 2016 - Third Reading - Pass the bill

absent No Yes

10th May 2017, 10:18 AM – Senate Social Security Legislation Amendment (Youth Jobs Path: Prepare, Trial, Hire) Bill 2016 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea

No No Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the Coalition's Youth Jobs PaTH” which either Louise Pratt or Chris Ketter could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Louise Pratt Chris Ketter Supporters vote
no votes listed