Compare how Louise Pratt and David Feeney voted on uranium export

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for uranium export” which either Louise Pratt or David Feeney could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Louise Pratt and David Feeney on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Louise Pratt	David Feeney	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for uranium export” which either Louise Pratt or David Feeney could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Louise Pratt	David Feeney	Supporters vote
13th Mar 2013, 3:58 PM – Senate Motions — Uranium Exports - Review all bilateral uranium supply arrangements	No	No	No
22nd Mar 2012, 1:46 PM – Senate Motions — Nuclear Energy - India and other countries standing outside the NPT	No	No	No
23rd Nov 2011 – Senate Motions — Uranium Exports - For export of uranium to India	No	absent	Yes
31st Oct 2011 – Senate Motions — Nuclear Nonproliferation - Identify countries that won't sell to	No	No	No
12th Nov 2008, 3:51 PM – Senate Motions — Uranium Exports — Take into account public opinion and the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties report	No	No	No