We can't say anything concrete about how Joe Bullock voted on nuclear energy
How Joe Bullock voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should support nuclear energy generation in Australia
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for nuclear energy” which Joe Bullock could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Joe Bullock on this policy.
| Division | Joe Bullock | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for nuclear energy” which Joe Bullock could have attended.
| Division | Joe Bullock | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
18th Mar 2015, 3:54 PM – Senate Motions - Nuclear Energy - SA Royal Commission into the Nuclear Fuel Cycle |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Joe Bullock was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.