We can't say anything concrete about how Ian Campbell voted on increasing fishing restrictions
How Ian Campbell voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase fishing restrictions so that fish populations are sustainable
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing fishing restrictions” which Ian Campbell could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Ian Campbell on this policy.
| Division | Ian Campbell | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing fishing restrictions” which Ian Campbell could have attended.
| Division | Ian Campbell | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
19th Jun 2006, 3:43 PM – Senate Motions - Sea Bottom Trawl Fishing - Address destructive impact |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Ian Campbell was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.