We can't say anything concrete about how Glenn Sterle voted on recognising the State of Palestine
How Glenn Sterle voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should officially recognise the State of Palestine
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for recognising the State of Palestine” which Glenn Sterle could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Glenn Sterle on this policy.
| Division | Glenn Sterle | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for recognising the State of Palestine” which Glenn Sterle could have attended.
| Division | Glenn Sterle | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
25th Jun 2024, 5:08 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Middle East: Occupied Palestinian Territories - Recognise the State of Palestine |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Glenn Sterle was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.