We can't say anything concrete about how Glenn Sterle voted on acknowledging the Government's role in foreign conflicts
How Glenn Sterle voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should acknowledge the role it has played in any foreign conflicts which caused loss of life and were not directly for the defense of Australia or its people
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for acknowledging the Government's role in foreign conflicts” which Glenn Sterle could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Glenn Sterle on this policy.
| Division | Glenn Sterle | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for acknowledging the Government's role in foreign conflicts” which Glenn Sterle could have attended.
| Division | Glenn Sterle | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
11th Sep 2023, 4:23 PM – Senate Documents - Australian Secret Intelligence Service - Order for the Production of Documents |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Glenn Sterle has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.