We can't say anything concrete about how Glenn Sterle voted on an Australian bill of rights
How Glenn Sterle voted compared to someone who agrees that the government should introduce an Australian bill of rights either as a piece of legislation or as part of the Constitution
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for an Australian bill of rights” which Glenn Sterle could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Glenn Sterle on this policy.
| Division | Glenn Sterle | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for an Australian bill of rights” which Glenn Sterle could have attended.
| Division | Glenn Sterle | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
2nd Dec 2019, 3:58 PM – Senate Motions - Racism - Introduce an Australian Charter of Rights |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Glenn Sterle was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.