We can't say anything concrete about how Glenn Sterle voted on increasing the initial tax rate for working holiday makers to 15%
How Glenn Sterle voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase the tax rate for working holiday visa holders so that they are taxed at a rate of 15% on every dollar earned up to $37,000
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing the initial tax rate for working holiday makers to 15%” which Glenn Sterle could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Glenn Sterle on this policy.
| Division | Glenn Sterle | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
1st Dec 2016, 8:33 PM – Senate Income Tax Rates Amendment (Working Holiday Maker Reform) Bill 2016 (No. 2) - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing the initial tax rate for working holiday makers to 15%” which Glenn Sterle could have attended.
| Division | Glenn Sterle | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
1st Dec 2016, 8:25 PM – Senate Income Tax Rates Amendment (Working Holiday Maker Reform) Bill 2016 (No. 2) - in Committee - Don't insist on amendments |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Glenn Sterle was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.