We can't say anything concrete about how Glenn Sterle voted on Copyright reforms
How Glenn Sterle voted compared to someone who agrees that Copyright laws in Australia requires reforms to modernise the Copyright Act, as recommended by the The Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC). Australia should broaden the existing 'fair dealing' exceptions to a much broader, flexible 'fair use' exception, in line with US copyright law.
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Copyright reforms” which Glenn Sterle could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Glenn Sterle on this policy.
| Division | Glenn Sterle | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Copyright reforms” which Glenn Sterle could have attended.
| Division | Glenn Sterle | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
30th Nov 2006, 11:00 PM – Senate Copyright Amendment Bill 2006 - In Committee - Technological protection measures + copyright infringement |
absent | Yes |
30th Nov 2006, 10:06 PM – Senate Copyright Amendment Bill 2006 - In Committee - Cap on licence fees |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Glenn Sterle was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.