Compare how Glenn Sterle and David Feeney voted on equal treatment for all couples

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for equal treatment for all couples” which either Glenn Sterle or David Feeney could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Glenn Sterle and David Feeney on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Glenn Sterle	David Feeney	Supporters vote
12th Nov 2008, 6:18 PM – Senate Same-Sex Relationships (Equal Treatment in Commonwealth Laws - Superannuation) Bill 2008 - In Committee - Private sector	absent	No	Yes
15th Oct 2008, 10:03 AM – Senate Same-Sex Relationships (Equal Treatment in Commonwealth Laws - Superannuation) Bill 2008 - Second Reading - Remove discrimination	No	No	Yes
18th Sep 2007, 6:07 PM – Senate Tax Laws Amendment (2007 Measures No. 4) Bill 2007 and others - In Committee - Remove discrimination	Yes	-	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for equal treatment for all couples” which either Glenn Sterle or David Feeney could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Glenn Sterle	David Feeney	Supporters vote
no votes listed