We can't say anything concrete about how Chris Evans voted on increasing accessibility of government data and documents
How Chris Evans voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should make its data and documents more accessible for the general public and Parliament
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing accessibility of government data and documents” which Chris Evans could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Chris Evans on this policy.
| Division | Chris Evans | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing accessibility of government data and documents” which Chris Evans could have attended.
| Division | Chris Evans | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
11th Oct 2012, 12:24 PM – Senate Documents — Public Interest Disclosure Bill, Order for the Production of Documents |
absent | Yes |
11th Oct 2012, 12:20 PM – Senate Documents — National Data Retention Scheme; Order for the Production of Documents |
absent | Yes |
11th Oct 2012, 12:15 PM – Senate Documents — Data Retention Advice; Order for the Production of Documents |
absent | Yes |
10th Oct 2012, 3:50 PM – Senate Documents — Productivity Commission Report; Order for the Production of Documents |
absent | Yes |
19th Mar 2012, 4:18 PM – Senate Documents — Serco Training Manuals; Order for the Production of Documents |
absent | Yes |
28th Feb 2012, 3:42 PM – Senate Documents — Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security; Order for the Production of Documents |
absent | Yes |
9th Feb 2012, 12:55 PM – Senate Documents — Gambling; Order for the Production of Documents |
absent | Yes |
26th Feb 2007, 3:49 PM – Senate Motions - Smartcard - Privacy |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Chris Evans has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.