We can't say anything concrete about how Chris Evans voted on increasing protection of Aboriginal heritage sites
How Chris Evans voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase the protection of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural heritage sites
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing protection of Aboriginal heritage sites” which Chris Evans could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Chris Evans on this policy.
| Division | Chris Evans | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing protection of Aboriginal heritage sites” which Chris Evans could have attended.
| Division | Chris Evans | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
19th Mar 2013, 3:50 PM – Senate Motions - Quinkan Rock Art Galleries - Protect from mining activities |
No | Yes |
16th Aug 2006, 3:57 PM – Senate Motions - Burrup Peninsula Rock Art - Protect rock art |
absent | Yes |
28th Mar 2006, 5:26 PM – Senate Motions — Tarkine Aboriginal Rock Art — Prevent vandalism |
absent | Yes |
28th Mar 2006, 4:06 PM – Senate Motions - Tarkine Aboriginal Rock Art - Prevent vandalism |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Chris Evans has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.