We can't say anything concrete about how Chris Ellison voted on increasing fishing restrictions
How Chris Ellison voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase fishing restrictions so that fish populations are sustainable
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing fishing restrictions” which Chris Ellison could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Chris Ellison on this policy.
| Division | Chris Ellison | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing fishing restrictions” which Chris Ellison could have attended.
| Division | Chris Ellison | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
19th Jun 2006, 3:43 PM – Senate Motions - Sea Bottom Trawl Fishing - Address destructive impact |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Chris Ellison has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.