We can't say anything concrete about how Alan Eggleston voted on increasing freedom of political communication
How Alan Eggleston voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase freedom of political communication in Australia by, for example, protecting people's right to inform others about issues and events in the public interest
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing freedom of political communication” which Alan Eggleston could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Alan Eggleston on this policy.
| Division | Alan Eggleston | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th Sep 2007, 12:39 PM – Senate Commonwealth Electoral Amendment (Democratic Plebiscites) Bill 2007 - Second Reading - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing freedom of political communication” which Alan Eggleston could have attended.
| Division | Alan Eggleston | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
14th Nov 2013, 11:34 AM – Senate Motions - Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee Reference - Surveillance |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Alan Eggleston was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.