We can't say anything concrete about how Alan Eggleston voted on banning all investment in cluster munitions
How Alan Eggleston voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should ban both direct and indirect (e.g. through parent companies) investment in cluster munitions
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for banning all investment in cluster munitions” which Alan Eggleston could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Alan Eggleston on this policy.
| Division | Alan Eggleston | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
21st Aug 2012, 1:44 PM – Senate Criminal Code Amendment (Cluster Munitions Prohibition) Bill 2010 - In Committee - Ban investment |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for banning all investment in cluster munitions” which Alan Eggleston could have attended.
| Division | Alan Eggleston | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
12th May 2011 – Senate Motions - Cluster Bombs - Extend prohibitions |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Alan Eggleston was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.