We can't say anything concrete about how Steph Hodgins-May voted on transgender children and young people having access to gender affirming healthcare
How Steph Hodgins-May voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should not restrict access to gender affirming healthcare for transgender people under the age of eighteen, rather they should leave healthcare matters in the hands of the professional bodies responsible for administering such healthcare (e.g., the Australian Medical Association, the Australian Psychological Society, etc.)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for transgender children and young people having access to gender affirming healthcare” which Steph Hodgins-May could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Steph Hodgins-May on this policy.
| Division | Steph Hodgins-May | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for transgender children and young people having access to gender affirming healthcare” which Steph Hodgins-May could have attended.
| Division | Steph Hodgins-May | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
26th Nov 2024, 4:26 PM – Senate Committees - Community Affairs References Committee; Reference - Use of puberty blockers |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Steph Hodgins-May has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.