Compare how Sarah Henderson and Peter Khalil voted on increasing scrutiny of unions

Photo of Sarah Henderson

Sarah Henderson

Liberal Party Senator for Victoria since September 2019

Voted consistently for increasing scrutiny of unions
Photo of Peter Khalil

Peter Khalil

Australian Labor Party Representative for Wills since July 2016

Voted consistently against increasing scrutiny of unions

How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should increase scrutiny of unions and employer organisations by, for example, creating a commission to monitor them and applying the same standards of disclosure to them as to corporations as well as the same penalties for misconduct

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing scrutiny of unions” which either Sarah Henderson or Peter Khalil could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sarah Henderson and Peter Khalil on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Sarah Henderson Peter Khalil Supporters vote

19th Oct 2016, 11:13 AM – Representatives Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Amendment Bill 2014 - Third Reading - Pass the bill

Yes No Yes

12th Dec 2013, 9:14 AM – Representatives Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Amendment Bill 2013 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea

Yes - Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing scrutiny of unions” which either Sarah Henderson or Peter Khalil could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Sarah Henderson Peter Khalil Supporters vote
no votes listed