Compare how Sarah Henderson and Christopher Pyne voted on greater control over items brought into immigration detention centres

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for greater control over items brought into immigration detention centres” which either Sarah Henderson or Christopher Pyne could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sarah Henderson and Christopher Pyne on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Sarah Henderson	Christopher Pyne	Supporters vote
7th Feb 2018, 4:55 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Prohibiting Items in Immigration Detention Facilities) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Main idea of the bill	Yes	Yes	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for greater control over items brought into immigration detention centres” which either Sarah Henderson or Christopher Pyne could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Sarah Henderson	Christopher Pyne	Supporters vote
7th Feb 2018, 4:48 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Prohibiting Items in Immigration Detention Facilities) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Don't read the bill a second time	No	No	No