Compare how Sarah Henderson and Emma McBride voted on tighter means testing of family payments
Sarah Henderson
Liberal Party Senator for Victoria since September 2019
Emma McBride
Australian Labor Party Representative for Dobell since July 2016
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should target family payments to low and moderate income households, to the exclusion of higher income households.
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for tighter means testing of family payments ” which either Sarah Henderson or Emma McBride could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sarah Henderson and Emma McBride on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Sarah Henderson | Emma McBride | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for tighter means testing of family payments ” which either Sarah Henderson or Emma McBride could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".