Compare how Richard Di Natale and David Feeney voted on Australia's timber industry

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Australia's timber industry” which either Richard Di Natale or David Feeney could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Richard Di Natale and David Feeney on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Richard Di Natale	David Feeney	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Australia's timber industry” which either Richard Di Natale or David Feeney could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Richard Di Natale	David Feeney	Supporters vote
11th Jun 2020, 4:52 PM – Senate Motions - Forestry - Protect native forests	Yes	-	No
12th Feb 2020, 4:30 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Logging in the Tarkine	Yes	-	No
17th Aug 2015 – Senate Motions - Tasmania: Timber Industry - Support	absent	-	Yes
25th Jun 2013, 3:59 PM – Senate Motions - Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area - Prohibit logging	Yes	Yes	No
20th Jun 2013, 12:11 PM – Senate Motions - National Parks - Protect	Yes	absent	No
11th May 2010, 4:22 PM – Senate Motions - Environment: Millewa Forest - Stop logging	-	No	No