We can't say anything concrete about how Ralph Babet voted on the territories being able to legalise euthanasia
How Ralph Babet voted compared to someone who agrees that the parliaments of the Northern Territory and the Australian Capital Territory should have the power to legalise euthanasia (also known as voluntary assisted dying)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the territories being able to legalise euthanasia” which Ralph Babet could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Ralph Babet on this policy.
| Division | Ralph Babet | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Nov 2022, 9:26 AM – Senate Restoring Territory Rights Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the territories being able to legalise euthanasia” which Ralph Babet could have attended.
| Division | Ralph Babet | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Ralph Babet was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.