Compare how Ralph Babet and Jacqui Lambie voted on increasing restrictions on gambling

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing restrictions on gambling” which either Ralph Babet or Jacqui Lambie could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Ralph Babet and Jacqui Lambie on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Ralph Babet Jacqui Lambie Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing restrictions on gambling” which either Ralph Babet or Jacqui Lambie could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Ralph Babet Jacqui Lambie Supporters vote

8th Oct 2024, 3:46 PM – Senate Motions - Gambling Advertising - Ban

No Yes Yes

14th Aug 2024, 4:40 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Gambling Advertising - Ban

No Yes Yes

29th Jul 2019, 4:03 PM – Senate Motions - Gambling - A new inquiry

- Yes Yes

29th Mar 2017, 4:24 PM – Senate Motions - Gambling - Apply the National Consumer Protection Framework

- Yes Yes

12th Sep 2016, 3:59 PM – Senate Motions - Gambling - Against gambling advertising

- Yes Yes

22nd Sep 2014, 6:08 PM – Senate Omnibus Repeal Day (Autumn 2014) Bill 2014 - in Committee - Interactive Gambling Act and ACMA

- No No