Compare how Raff Ciccone and Catryna Bilyk voted on compulsory income management for welfare recipients
Raff Ciccone
Australian Labor Party Senator for Victoria since March 2019
Catryna Bilyk
Australian Labor Party Senator for Tasmania since July 2008
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce a hybrid welfare quarantining regime to replace the Cashless Debit Card (CDC) regime and it should be compulsory for certain recipients
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for compulsory income management for welfare recipients” which either Raff Ciccone or Catryna Bilyk could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Raff Ciccone and Catryna Bilyk on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Raff Ciccone | Catryna Bilyk | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
22nd Jun 2023, 1:27 PM – Senate Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Income Management Reform) Bill 2023 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
22nd Jun 2023, 1:13 PM – Senate Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Income Management Reform) Bill 2023 - in Committee - Sunset clause |
No | No | No |
22nd Jun 2023, 12:49 PM – Senate Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Income Management Reform) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for compulsory income management for welfare recipients” which either Raff Ciccone or Catryna Bilyk could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Raff Ciccone | Catryna Bilyk | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
28th Feb 2024, 6:34 PM – Senate Regulations - Social Security (Administration) (Declared Child Protection State — NSW, Qld, SA and Vic) Determination 2023 and two others - Disallow |
No | No | No |
4th Dec 2023, 4:25 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Social Security (Administration) (Enhanced Income Management Regime — Cth Referrals & Exemptions) Determination 2023 and another - Disallowance |
absent | No | No |