Compare how Mitch Fifield and Nick McKim voted on a Royal Commission into Violence and Abuse against People with Disability

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a Royal Commission into Violence and Abuse against People with Disability” which either Mitch Fifield or Nick McKim could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mitch Fifield and Nick McKim on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Mitch Fifield Nick McKim Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a Royal Commission into Violence and Abuse against People with Disability” which either Mitch Fifield or Nick McKim could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Mitch Fifield Nick McKim Supporters vote

14th Feb 2019, 12:13 PM – Senate Motions - Disability Services - Establish a royal commission

No Yes Yes

4th Dec 2018, 4:25 PM – Senate Motions - Disability Services - Establish a royal commission

No Yes Yes

19th Sep 2018, 4:47 PM – Senate Motions - Aged Care - Royal Commission and people with disability

absent Yes Yes

29th Mar 2017, 4:14 PM – Senate Motions - Institutional Care - For a royal commission

No Yes Yes