Compare how Mitch Fifield and David Bushby voted on nuclear energy

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for nuclear energy” which either Mitch Fifield or David Bushby could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mitch Fifield and David Bushby on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Mitch Fifield David Bushby Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for nuclear energy” which either Mitch Fifield or David Bushby could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Mitch Fifield David Bushby Supporters vote

17th Oct 2018, 3:21 PM – Senate Motions - Nuclear Energy - Lift ban

No No Yes

18th Mar 2015, 3:54 PM – Senate Motions - Nuclear Energy - SA Royal Commission into the Nuclear Fuel Cycle

Yes Yes Yes